CAPABILITY STATEMENT

What Auvant can deliver for the public sector.

Auvant Technologies is a Quebec-based software, AI, and automation company. We design web tools, internal systems, and digital workflows for organizations that need to balance public service, security, accessibility, governance, and long-term maintainability.

Supplier profile

What makes Auvant ready for public-sector work

We make the work concrete for public teams: understandable requirements, documented decisions, visible risks, and deliverables that are easy to review.

Services in French and English

Documentation, handoff, and clear system ownership

Accessibility-oriented design targeting WCAG 2.1 AA

Careful approach to data, access, and deployment

PUBLIC BUYERS

Designed for decision-makers, operations, and IT teams

A public digital project is not won by a polished interface alone. It has to reassure leadership, reduce field-team work, respect IT constraints, and remain understandable after delivery. That combination is what we build around.

Leadership

Clarity on scope, risks, likely costs, decision steps, and expected outcomes.

Operations teams

Fewer calls, less duplicate entry, visible statuses, dashboards, and workflows that reflect real work.

IT and governance

Readable architecture, controlled access, protected secrets, documentation, handoff, and suitable hosting options.

Residents

Bilingual, accessible, mobile-friendly services that are clear enough to use without calling for every question.

Capability statements

Capability statements

Software automation

Turn manual processes into reliable, measurable, maintainable digital workflows.

Applied AI systems

Assistants, extraction, triage, and decision automation with guardrails and human oversight.

Municipal technology

Tools for citizen services, internal operations, permits, requests, and reporting.

Operational modernization

Reduce duplicate entry, connect existing systems, and improve team visibility.

Accessible bilingual products

French/English interfaces, semantic web, keyboard access, contrast, and accessible forms.

DELIVERABLES

Deliverables a committee can review

We make decisions visible. Even an exploratory mandate should produce artifacts that leadership, operations, IT, and procurement can review without depending on a live demo.

Current-process map

Steps, roles, pain points, systems used, data handled, and recurring exceptions.

Prototype or functional mockups

Key screens, resident path, staff path, error states, and status logic.

Data and access matrix

Collected fields, justification, visibility, roles, retention to discuss, and known risks.

Acceptance criteria

Concrete conditions for saying a feature is ready, testable, and operable.

Implementation plan

Phases, dependencies, migration, training, launch, support, and next decisions.

Handoff guide

Configuration, accounts, environments, basic procedures, and things to watch after launch.

Alignment matrix

Alignment matrix

This matrix is not legal advice or a certification. It explains how we structure work to support the obligations of a public organization.

Accessibility

SGQRI / WCAG-oriented design, contrast, keyboard use, labels, semantic structure, and form validation.

Checklist, keyboard tests, interface corrections

Privacy

Data minimization, justified collection, retention discussed, limited access, and validation of required fields.

Data inventory, decision notes, access configuration

Security

Encrypted transport, separated environments, secrets outside code, least-privilege access, and logging according to risk.

Deployment diagram, access log, recovery procedure

Bilingual delivery

Indexable French/English routes and content, consistent labels, bilingual emails, and bilingual form states.

Content inventory, FR/EN pages, consistency review

AI governance

Human oversight, clear limits, useful traceability, escalation, and no fully automated sensitive decisions without proper scoping.

Usage policy, decision register, exception scenarios

Operations

Support documentation, handoff, acceptance criteria, configuration backup, and maintenance plan.

Operations guide, change log, acceptance criteria

Easy to place inside a procurement process

Auvant can participate without forcing a large project immediately. A mandate can start small, produce concrete deliverables, then expand into implementation.

Scoping noteMap the process, data, users, risks, and implementation estimate.

Functional prototypeTest a real workflow with screens, logic, simulated data, and decision criteria.

Implementation mandateBuild, integrate, document, and launch the system with follow-up.

Vendor collaborationWork with an IT team, integrator, municipal vendor, or existing internal service.

Starting offer: municipal discovery sprint

A short format to produce something useful before committing to a full implementation.

Week 1Workshops, current process, users, data, risks, and procurement constraints.

Week 2Prototype of key screens, target architecture, and bilingual scenarios.

Week 3Stakeholder validation, adjustments, estimate, and roadmap.

Week 4Decision package: scope, indicative budget, risks, deliverables, and implementation plan.

What the sprint leaves in your hands

Clickable prototype of the main screensSummary of risks, dependencies, and decisions to makeRecommended scope for a first versionIndicative budget and phasing scenarioList of required data, access, and contentNext-step plan usable in an internal discussion

Ready for a first conversation

A short discussion is often enough to identify the right format: scoping note, proof of concept, fixed mandate, or ongoing support.